How to build confidence in your agentic inventory and pricing decisions

The confidence gap in AI for retail

Most retail leaders have already invested in AI in some capacity, with forecasting tools, dynamic pricing platforms, and demand-planning dashboards now all commonplace in businesses.

However, very few of these leaders actually feel confident in these tools.

You can often see it in meetings: an AI recommendation flashes on screen, and the first instinct is still to reach for a gut feel. “That doesn’t look right.” “Let’s wait until we see next week’s numbers.”

That hesitation is completely rational. Retailers have been burned before by black-box models, over-promising tech vendors, and data that doesn’t quite seem to line up.

And now agentic systems—AI that can act, not just analyze—magnify both the opportunity and the fear. When AI starts to take action, people will naturally question whether or not they can really trust it to make crucial commercial calls on their behalf.

Building that trust is not a leap of faith, but about structure, transparency, and a staged approach that lets confidence grow over time.

Stage one: assistive intelligence

In most retail pricing or inventory workflows, there’s a clear starting point: using AI as an advisor.

Take markdown planning as an example. The traditional process looks like this:

1. Merchandiser identifies slow-moving products

2. Analyst models a few discount scenarios

3. Director approves a markdown schedule

4. Finance double-checks the margin impact

5. Prices go live next week

Now, inject AI in assistive mode:

• The system flags SKUs at risk of aging

• It simulates multiple markdown depths instantly

• It predicts profit, revenue, and sell-through outcomes for each

• It recommends the top three options, before merchandising teams choose which to apply

The process doesn’t change overnight; it simply gets richer and faster. The team still owns the decision, but confidence grows because the recommendations are tested against live data, not gut feel.

The same applies to replenishment: AI agents can suggest optimal order quantities or safety stock adjustments, leaving the buyer or planner to confirm.

The goal at this stage is alignment, not automation. People see the logic, challenge it, and slowly realize the AI often gets closer to the truth than manual methods.

Stage two: collaborative execution

Once the business sees consistent accuracy, it’s time for AI to execute, but within boundaries. And, in retail, this is where the concept of guardrails becomes crucial.

For example, in dynamic pricing:

• Minimum margin = 40%

• Markdown cap = 15%

• Competitor undercut limit = $2

• Brand integrity rule = premium SKUs can’t drop below certain thresholds

Within those boundaries, the system adjusts prices automatically, maybe even hourly, while merchants receive a daily summary of actions taken and outcomes achieved.

The business still controls the playbook, but the agent runs the plays.

In inventory management, guardrails might include:

• Max stock cover per SKU

• Lead-time tolerance

• Supplier minimum order quantities

• Distribution center capacity limits

The AI can then execute replenishment actions dynamically within those limits. When something unusual happens, like a supplier delay or unexpected demand spike, the system can flag an exception for a person to review.

This is the collaborative phase: people handle exceptions and strategy, while the agent handles execution.

Stage three: autonomous optimization

Eventually, confidence reaches the point where the system can run specific decisions and entire processes end to end.

In pricing, that might mean the AI continuously tests micro-markdowns within the agreed ruleset. For example, adjusting prices by 2–3% daily to maintain margin while, at the same time, clearing stock.

In inventory, it might autonomously trigger replenishment orders, reallocate stock between stores, or rebalance channel inventory.

Crucially, this doesn’t mean people disappear. They just move upstream; they set the objectives, constraints, and governance framework that guide the agent. Think of it a bit like a self-driving car: you decide the destination and speed limits, while the car handles the route.

Making confidence measurable

To move leadership and teams from skepticism around AI and automation to belief, you need to quantify confidence. In other words, let the numbers speak for themselves.

Practical metrics include:

• Decision accuracy: compare AI recommendations vs. human outcomes over time

• Margin impact: track net profit per SKU before and after adoption

• Cycle time: measure how long it takes to go from insight to action

• Exception rate: the lower this gets, the stronger the model’s reliability

• Human override frequency: should fall steadily as trust builds

Dashboards showing these KPIs side-by-side with human benchmarks create a powerful narrative and demonstrate that there are clear reasons to be confident in the technology.

Embedding agentic thinking in business processes

Confidence comes from familiarity, not just data, and trust can be built by integrating AI into the day-to-day rituals of retail.

Monday trade meetings:

Start with the system’s actions and outcomes: “Last week the agent reduced 243 SKUs; margin held at 42.3%; sell-through improved 6%.”

Now you’re reviewing results, not debating whether to act.

Promotion planning:

Let the agent simulate multiple scenarios, showing predicted revenue lift and cannibalization risk. The team chooses which scenario to approve, and confidence grows because every decision is evidence-based.

Open-to-buy reviews:

Agents can update stock projections live. Merchandisers see how next week’s replenishment actions affect cash flow instantly, rather than waiting for the finance team’s spreadsheet.

End-of-season debriefs:

Use the system’s data to show which agent-led pricing actions drove the most incremental profit, creating an ever-improving learning cycle.

Culture: the real unlock

Technology won’t create confidence on its own. People need time, language, and structure.

These three things help enormously:

Create an internal AI glossary.

The glossary can be simple one-liners that explain terms like “elasticity,” “confidence interval,” and “guardrail.” When everyone uses the same language, fear drops quickly.

Nominate AI champions within each function.

Champions are the tech translators who understand both commercial nuance and technical capability. They help bridge the confidence gap.

Celebrate people + AI wins.

When an AI-recommended markdown beats human intuition, share the story. Success stories focused on commercial outcomes build trust faster than presentations ever will.

Confidence, governance, and co-creation

For senior leaders, the leap from analytics to autonomous action needs a new kind of oversight. A simple governance model works best, giving executives comfort that control remains intact even as decision volume scales.

• Policy layer: define what decisions agents can make (pricing, replenishment, promos).

• Control layer: set the commercial rules and thresholds.

• Audit layer: monitor actions and exceptions; ensure traceability.

• Accountability layer: assign ownership. Who should intervene if something goes wrong?

Many retailers assume confidence will come once the system has “proven itself.” But in reality, it grows faster when teams help to build it.

When planners and merchandisers participate in training the models, cleaning data, defining guardrails, and testing scenarios, they see the logic firsthand. And this co-creation also protects against overreliance on vendors. Internal capability grows, so the business isn’t held hostage by a third-party algorithm it doesn’t fully understand.

A simple confidence ladder

Retailers typically build confidence in AI in three stages. First comes the advisory phase, where the system makes recommendations but people still approve every action; over time, teams begin to see the AI’s outputs align with their own judgment.

Next is assisted execution, where AI takes small, reversible actions that are monitored daily, and exceptions gradually become rare.

The final stage is autonomous operations, where the AI acts within agreed rules and humans step in only when needed. By this point, confidence is institutional, well-earned through consistent results and minimal overrides, not promises or one-off champions.

From instinct to evidence

Retail has always prized intuition, and that gut instinct will always matter. But in a world of millions of data points per day, instinct alone can’t keep up.

Agentic systems don’t replace people’s judgment, but amplify it. They provide the evidence base for better instincts, leading to decision making that’s faster and more consistent.

Confidence, then, isn’t about believing machines over people, but aligning both to a single version of truth.

The new question for retail leaders

For decades, the key question in retail trading has been: “What’s the right decision?” In the agentic era, the question shifts to: “Who or what is best placed to make the right decision, and when?”

If your teams can answer that confidently, you’re already ahead. Because the future of retail isn’t just about smarter systems; it’s about organizations confident enough to let those systems trade on their behalf.

Get the guide: "The future of retail is agentic."

Join us at the National Retail Foundation's 2026 conference "Retail's Big Show." Stop by booth #4040 to talk to our team and see our agentic merchandising solution in action. Then, join us for an exclusive roundtable discussion with with Dan Finley, CEO of Debenhams Group.